Funded$195,000Fix & FlipPensacola, FLFunded$203,000Fix & FlipBurleson, TXFunded$230,787Fix & FlipFort Worth, TXFunded$525,000Fix & FlipWashington, DCFunded$415,000Fix & FlipSilver Spring, MDFunded$490,000Fix & FlipWashington, DCFunded$720,000DSCR Cash-OutSt. Petersburg, FLFunded$385,000DSCR Cash-OutPigeon Forge, TNFunded$445,000DSCR Cash-OutNashville, TNFunded$3,150,000Multifamily AcquisitionFort Myers, FLFunded$978,000CommercialWhite Settlement, TXFunded$2,750,000Multifamily BridgeSilver Spring, MDFunded$957,900Fix & FlipEast Meadow, NYFunded$1,065,750Fix & FlipWashington, DCFunded$135,000DSCRCleveland, OHFunded$340,000DSCR R&TSandpoint, IDFunded$185,000DSCR Cash-OutSeneca Falls, NYFunded$560,000DSCR PurchaseGarfield, NJFunded$225,000DSCR PurchaseSeneca Falls, NYFunded$116,000DSCR R&TGrandview, MOFunded$195,000DSCR Cash-OutTulsa, OKFunded$425,000DSCR PurchaseWoodstock, NYFunded$390,000DSCR PurchaseWoodstock, NYFunded$285,000DSCR Cash-Out IOLawrenceville, GAFunded$275,000DSCRAlbuquerque, NMFunded$175,000DSCRLos Fresnos, TXFunded$1,150,000DSCROakland, CAFunded$365,000DSCRPortland, MEFunded$395,000DSCRLinden, NJFunded$825,000DSCR PurchaseSyosset, NYFunded$1,017,700Fix & FlipWashington, DCFunded$432,000Fix & FlipFalls Church, VAFunded$385,000Fix & FlipWashington, DCFunded$111,200Commercial BridgeCleveland, OHFunded$1,456,500Fix & FlipColleyville, TXFunded$759,750DSCR R&TSedona, AZ
The 70% Rule Is Dead: How to Actually Analyze a Flip in 2026
Fix & Flip

The 70% Rule Is Dead: How to Actually Analyze a Flip in 2026

Published · 818 Capital Partners· 2 min read

Why the 70% Rule No Longer Works


The 70% rule says: never pay more than 70% of a property's After Repair Value (ARV) minus repair costs. For decades, this was the gold standard for analyzing flips.


In 2026, it's dangerously oversimplified.


What Changed


The 70% rule was designed for a different market:


  • Interest rates were 4-5% — Now fix-and-flip rates are 10-12%
  • Holding periods were 3-4 months — Now 6-8 months is more realistic due to permitting delays and contractor availability
  • Insurance was predictable — Now builder's risk and vacant property insurance can add $3,000-$8,000 to a project
  • Closing costs were lower — Double-close scenarios and higher title insurance rates eat into margins

  • A Better Framework


    Instead of the 70% rule, use this calculation:


    Maximum Purchase = ARV - Rehab - Carrying Costs - Selling Costs - Minimum Profit


    Where:

  • Rehab = Contractor bids + 15% contingency
  • Carrying costs = Monthly (loan payment + insurance + taxes + utilities) x expected hold time
  • Selling costs = 6-8% of ARV (agent commissions, transfer taxes, title)
  • Minimum profit = 15-20% of total investment (not ARV)

  • Real-World Example


    Property: 3BR/2BA in suburban Atlanta

  • ARV: $350,000
  • Rehab estimate: $65,000
  • Carrying costs (6 months): $14,400
  • Selling costs (7%): $24,500
  • Minimum profit (18% of investment): ~$30,000

  • Maximum purchase = $350,000 - $65,000 - $14,400 - $24,500 - $30,000 = $216,100


    The 70% rule would have said $180,000. The detailed analysis shows you can pay up to $216,100 and still make your target return. That's a $36,000 difference that could mean winning or losing the deal.


    When to Walk Away


    Even with the better framework, some deals don't work. Red flags:


  • Carrying costs exceed 5% of ARV
  • Rehab scope requires permits you can't get in 30 days
  • Comparable sales are more than 6 months old
  • ARV depends on "the market going up"

  • The bottom line: do the math every time. Rules of thumb lost people money in 2024 and they'll lose money in 2026.

    Ready to Run Your Numbers?

    Submit your scenario and get an AI-powered analysis.

    Get Your Rate
    CallApply Now